Jump to content
  • Welcome to 205GTIDrivers.com!

    Hello dear visitor! Feel free to browse but we invite you to register completely free of charge in order to enjoy the full functionality of the website.

Sign in to follow this  
B1ack_Mi16

4x4 Rear Suspension On Fwd Car?

Recommended Posts

B1ack_Mi16

As topic says..

 

Is this straight forward, or is it some slight differences in the chassi/fuel tank that makes it difficult?

 

I'm dead tired of the rear torsion bar suspension that gets worn out faster than you can say chocolate cake and was wondering if there might be a better idea using a 4x4 rear suspension.

 

After all it's easier to change the roller bearings on these than to keep buying complete new rear subframes to get one with unworn bearing shafts for the FWD setup...

 

Anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cammmy

Would the lack of a diff or driveshafts matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
imaS

Front mount of the rear subframe is different design between 2wd and 4wd. Also the mounting points are not the same. Check from attachments.

The diff and the driveshafts are not needed. Just use outside part from the outer CV-joints to keep wheelbearing compressed.

post-253-134540341732_thumb.gifpost-253-134540341621_thumb.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rodionski

Does anyone have an idea which type of rear set up did the BTCC touring 405 use?

Obviously they were homologated FWD cars, but they would never achieve that much lowering with the stock rear beam, simply not possible due to the "ears" within which the torsion bars move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B1ack_Mi16

So the chassi is really that different?

I never had thought that.

 

Need to do some investigation / measurements then :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pugnut405

The bodyshells of the 4x4 and FWD cars are different. Quite what the difference is I'm not sure but there must be a reason??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B1ack_Mi16

True enough.

 

I thought it was mostly down to small details around fueltank area and slightly bigger tunnel so that both exhaust and prop-shaft would fit under the car.

Never dreams of pick-up points for suspension was different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roland1345402284
True enough.

 

I thought it was mostly down to small details around fueltank area and slightly bigger tunnel so that both exhaust and prop-shaft would fit under the car.

Never dreams of pick-up points for suspension was different.

 

 

When I bolted my 4x4 stuff into my 2wd car I found no difference at all other than for the tank mounts for the 4x4 tank.

This applies for both the Mi16x4 and the Glx4 subframes - which are the same anyway! (just different diff internals)

 

While the front mount of the 4x4 subframe is different compared to the 2wd mount, it (the 4x4 subframe) bolts straight in to the existing points in the 2wd car. (All mounting points lined perfectly up in my car anyway!)

Correct about the tunnel though. - It is bigger on the left side to allow for a differently aligned exhaust.

The tank is different to allow for the driveshaft. The tank is also deeper and hangs down more below the floor level. This is to counter the loss of volume due to the driveshaft. Because of this the mounting straps for the fuel tank are different - trial fit one - you will see what I mean.

 

If you intend to only use the 4x4 subframe and take out the diff and driveshafts and have the car as a 2wd then it should be a simple swap of the old subframe out and the new one in. I do remember that the 2wd tank gets in the way of the 4x4 subframe and therefore you will have to use the 4x4 tank. Other than that, the only thing you might have to have a look at is the exhaust alignment around the different subframe.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B1ack_Mi16

Exactly what I wanted to hear :)

 

I still have to see if I will go through with it thoug, it's just a cheap daily driver and it will be a little bit of work when I start thinking of handbrake wires, brake calipers etc..

 

But good to know it's possibe!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cammmy

I should mention that BX's have their own rear beam bearing issues (and the 4bie is a modified BX setup)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B1ack_Mi16

Yeah, I know.

 

I already am working on restoring a 405 T16 from scratch, but I still think the 4bie setup is easier to fix as it's just to buy new bearings.

 

The FWD rear beam needs new bearings and usually also new subframe which is insanely expensive.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rodionski

Here in Ukraine we never buy new rear beams.

 

We have dedicated restoration services where you return the worn bare beam and receive a fully reconditioned beam for about USD200.

 

This has become a routine exercise. And if you are on top of changing the bearings in time, usually you don't have to worry about changing the beam too often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×