Is There Anywhere Left Doing Group N Stainless Systems?

[Batfink 201]

why do people still mention omp? they have not been making exhausts for about 4 years now.

[205_sunderland 4]

why do people still mention omp? they have not been making exhausts for about 4 years now.

 

because you can still buy them in france etc

[Cameron 16]

stainless have a habit of cracking and being noisier.

 

I disagree.

[matt.f 16]

Be needing about 2,25in I would have thought,minimum

[Cameron 16]

2" will be fine for an 8V, and should be good for 150-180bhp without being restrictive.

 

2.25" is perfect for a 2.0 16V NA engine.. I only made mine out of 2.5" as it was readily available in thin gauge at work.

[205_sunderland 4]

Im leaning more and more to the group A system with 2.36" bore this rate , seems the perfect size difference between the two and i only want like i said to "TRY" and hit around 150 bhp at some point for now car will be standard, i might knife edge and port the tb and its getting an aftermarket filter in standard airbox, so all long as it flows well, im hoping that should be fine to run of pretty much standard motor for now and unlock that awsome sound of the systems too instead of my magnext backbox bellow at the minute (dont get me wrong everyone says the cars sounds lovely but i want a more true pug pop pop bang exhaust).

Edited August 15, 2011 by 205_sunderland

[Batfink 201]

2" will be fine for an 8V, and should be good for 150-180bhp without being restrictive.

 

2.25" is perfect for a 2.0 16V NA engine.. I only made mine out of 2.5" as it was readily available in thin gauge at work.

 

I agree. I get a custom race system made for the 106 TU engines and it copes absolutely fine with a 50mm bore on 180 bhp engines. Around 190bhp is the crossover point for a bigger bore. I cannot see why the 205 would need a bigger bore for the power it puts out. Its not like it revs high.